原創翻譯:龍騰網 http://www.herwqr.shop 翻譯:翻譯熊 轉載請注明出處
論壇地址:http://www.herwqr.shop/bbs/thread-485554-1-1.html



Washington’sanimosity towards Chinese tech giant Huawei is based on deep-rooted prejudice,while its crusade against the company is motivated by greed rather thansecurity concerns, the firm’s chief security officer said.
The persistentscaremongering campaign by the US targeting the Chinese company, which is oneof the pioneers in 5G technology development, appears to have got under theskin of one of its top executives, who hit back in an explosive rant.

華盛頓對中國科技巨頭華為的敵意是基于根深蒂固的偏見,而它對該公司的討伐是出于貪婪,而不是出于安全考慮,該公司的首席安全官說。
這家中國公司是5G技術發展的先驅之一,美國針對這家公司持續不斷的散布恐慌的行動,似乎激怒了該公司的一名高管,他以一場激烈的咆哮予以回擊。



Suffolk also alleged that the US launched thiswhole campaign against Huawei not because it fears for its sensitiveinformation, which it claims could allegedly be stolen by some notoriousChinese cyber-spies directly through the products offered by Huawei, but becauseAmerica itself wants to monopolize the market of new technologies and get ridof its competition.

薩福克還聲稱,美國發起了這個針對華為的行動不是因為擔心它的敏感信息——它聲稱,一些臭名昭著的中國網絡間諜可能會通過華為提供的產品直接竊取這些信息,而是因為美國自己想壟斷新技術市場,擺脫競爭。
“真正的恐懼是什么?是因為中國還是因為技術更好?”

“America says it wants open competitionbut then says: ‘Huawei, you can’t work in America – you’re banned.’ My beliefis America should face up to competition, it should face up to competitionbecause American citizens will benefit.”
He alsodismissed security concerns voiced by the US, calling them absurd and addingthat such statements only “belittle” thereal security problems.
“I’mwaiting for [the US State Secretary] Mike [Pompeo] to come back and say we’vebanned the trouser belt from being made in China because it’s a national securityrisk and armies can’t fight with trousers round their ankles.”

“美國表示希望開放競爭,但隨后又說:‘華為,你不能在美國運作——你被禁止。我的信念是,美國應該直面競爭,它應該直面競爭,因為美國公民將從中受益。”
他還駁斥了美國表達的安全擔憂,稱這些擔憂是荒謬的,并補充稱,此類聲明只是“貶低”真正的安全問題。
“我在等待(美國國務卿)邁克(蓬佩奧)回來,說我們已經禁止在中國生產褲帶,因為這對國家安全構成威脅,軍隊不能把褲帶套在腳踝上作戰。”

Prejudice or ‘ignorance’?
Suffolk also said that US officials are apparently just toostubborn in their prejudices against Beijing to ever treat Huawei fairly; headmitted he did not believe the company would ever be able to convince Washingtonthat it does not pose a security threat.
“Allwe can do is say: ‘Guys, if you want to come and look, come and look. If youwant to come and test, come and test. If you want to do verification, you aremore than welcome to. We don’t believe there is much more we can do.”
Meanwhile,another Huawei top executive, Peter Zhou, who is in charge of rolling out 5G,said that US politicians were just “ignorantof technology” and could not understand how it really works.He admitted he had often to “explainit to them like I do to my kids”.
Anyway, the US was up in arms against Huawei for quite some time.Over recent months, Washington banned federal agencies from using Huaweiproducts, prompting the company to file a lawsuit over what it called unfaircompetition; Washington also has spared no effort in attempts to prevent itsallies from even thinking about cooperation with the Chinese tech giant.



The US has even threatened to stop sharing intel with countrieswhich allow Huawei to build 5G infrastructure. However, so far it has failed toprovide a single piece of evidence suggesting that the Huawei technologiesmight indeed be used for spying.
While some nations, such as New Zealand and Australia, took the USwarnings at face value and banned Huawei from taking part in its national 5Gnetwork development, others were much more reluctant to follow the US lead.
In March, the European Commission ignored US calls to ban Huawei,but urged member states to continue assessing any cybersecurity threats.Several European nations indeed made their own assessment of the potentialthreat posed by the company’s products and came to the conclusion that therewas nothing to fear.
Belgium wasthe latest to say it found no proof of any “spying threat”posed by Huawei tech. Earlier,similar statements were made by Germany’s cyber security watchdog.

美國甚至威脅要停止與允許華為建設5G基礎設施的國家共享英特爾。然而,到目前為止,它沒有提供任何證據表明華為的技術可能確實被用于間諜活動。
盡管新西蘭和澳大利亞等一些國家對美國的警告信以為真,禁止華為參與國家5G網絡的開發,但其它國家卻遠不愿效仿美國的做法。
今年3月,歐盟委員會無視美國禁止華為的呼吁,但敦促成員國繼續評估任何網絡安全威脅。一些歐洲國家確實對該公司產品構成的潛在威脅做出了自己的評估,并得出結論:沒有什么可擔心的。
比利時是最新一個表示沒有發現華為技術公司構成任何“間諜威脅”的國家。早些時候,德國網絡安全監管機構也發表了類似聲明。